PE material multi-layer co-extruded high-barrier permeable vacuum Shrink Bag for aged cheese for storage packaging of respiring and non-respiring cheeses. High oxygen and water vapor barrier properties can greatly extend the shelf life of cheese, while bringing a more gorgeous appearance to the product.
With multi-layer co-extrusion high-barrier technology as the core, Tipack Group provides global users with high-barrier fresh-keeping packaging for food, including Shrink Film/shrink bag, Thermoforming Film, Vacuum bags, MAP Trays , VSP Trays , Fruit cups, K-cup, chamber vacuum, etc.
Tipack Group has three production bases in China, located in Suzhou, China, Wuxi, China and Anhui, China. Tipack is the earliest manufacturer in China to research and use multi-layer co-extrusion high barrier technology. Now, Tipack is also one of the drafters of China's fresh meat packaging industry standards, and continues to provide OEM and ODM services for the world's top 500 companies such as COFCO, Starbucks, and China Resources.
Soft Cheese Bag,vacuum bags for cheese,permeable vacuum bags for aging cheese,permeable vacuum bags for cheese Tipack Group , https://www.tipackgroup.com
The Tipack team provides users with 7/24 online quick response service. You can send us an inquiry, email or call us directly. Tipack service staff will give you the latest product information and quotation services within 24 hours, and we will feedback your message.
The compressor efficiently improves the bottleneck
In 2004, the air conditioner energy efficiency standards were introduced, setting a benchmark for the industry. By 2009, these standards were expected to be upgraded, pushing the existing Level 2 efficiency (with an Energy Efficiency Ratio of 3.2) down to become the new baseline—Level 5. This “triple jump†in efficiency standards created significant pressure on manufacturers, but the transition was not as daunting as it seemed.
As 2008 approached, the industry was on the brink of this major shift. Reporters from *China Electronics News* noticed a growing sense of anxiety among air conditioner companies. The challenge wasn't just about meeting new standards—it was about how they would manage the pressure across the entire supply chain. In 2004, when similar standards were introduced, manufacturers had adapted by adjusting their practices. This time, however, the pressure was likely to be passed down to compressor suppliers, who play a critical role in determining the overall efficiency of the unit.
Professor Li Hongqi, a refrigeration expert at Beijing Polytechnic University, emphasized that compressors account for over 88% of an air conditioner’s energy consumption. Improving their efficiency directly impacts the performance of the entire system. As a result, high-efficiency compressors became the focus of attention. However, the response from compressor manufacturers was mixed—many found themselves hitting a technological ceiling, with limited room for improvement in energy efficiency.
This situation led to intense competition among compressor companies. Those who could provide more efficient models stood to gain more customers. Yet, despite the demand, the technology was already reaching its limits. Many companies reported that the potential for further improvements had been largely exhausted. With air conditioner manufacturers under pressure to meet new standards, the race to develop more efficient compressors intensified.
Looking back, the push for higher efficiency in 2004 had faced similar challenges. Initially, the energy efficiency labeling system was delayed due to difficulties in meeting the required standards. While improving efficiency was technically feasible, many manufacturers struggled with rising costs and market pressures. As a result, the majority of air conditioners still fell into the lower efficiency categories, with only a small percentage achieving the highest levels.
The industry's reliance on compressors to meet energy targets became evident. Instead of investing in broader system improvements, many manufacturers opted to use high-efficiency compressors, shifting the burden onto suppliers. This strategy, while effective in the short term, raised concerns about long-term sustainability and cost distribution.
With the upcoming 2009 standards, the pressure on both manufacturers and suppliers is expected to increase significantly. Compressors, once seen as the key to solving efficiency issues, now face their own set of challenges. Technological bottlenecks, rising costs, and the need for innovation are all factors that must be addressed.
Some companies are exploring alternatives, such as inverter and scroll compressors, which offer better efficiency. Scroll compressors, for example, can improve energy efficiency by up to 40%, but their high production costs limit widespread adoption. Inverter compressors, on the other hand, allow for more precise control of power usage, leading to improved efficiency and reduced energy consumption.
As the industry moves toward 2009, the path forward remains uncertain. Manufacturers must find ways to balance cost, efficiency, and technological feasibility. For compressor suppliers, the challenge is clear: adapt or risk being left behind. The coming years will test the resilience and ingenuity of the entire air conditioning industry.
Next Article
February 19 Shanghai Steel Market Price Quotes