· People's commentary: Taxi reform, let the market turn "car key"

An industry directly faces the market to release vitality, which should be encouraged and worthy of expectation; and how the government moves from regulation to supervision and management to service, it also has a long way to go to reduce more than 400 yuan of “money money” every month, gradually liberalize the total amount and price control, and clarify property rights. Relationship... After Wuhan, Nanjing, Yiwu and other places, Hangzhou also took out the “Hangzhou Program” for taxi reform. At the same time, on September 16, Beijing's first government-licensed car "Shouqi about car" began operations, completely breaking the traditional taxi model. Can the exploration of various places make the taxi reform stable and far-reaching?
If the traditional taxi industry has entered the eve of irreversible reform, there should not be many people opposed. But how do you change and change to what extent? But accept the test of real logic. “Inaccurate positioning, imbalance between supply and demand, labor-management tension, and collision between new and old business conditions” is a prominent problem facing the traditional taxi industry. “Customized service, increased supply, enthusiasm, and innovation” is a new trend in the industry of new network vehicles. But is the two different? It seems that it cannot be generalized. For example, many countries have “the brothers” protesting the case of “Uber”.
However, regardless of whether you are a taxi or a special car, you must respect the right of passengers to vote with their feet. In order for the people to have a sense of gain, the reform must first improve the "user experience" of the passengers. From this, the interests of all parties can be guaranteed fairly and reasonably. The reason why the car is favored by many passengers is because people naturally prefer “on-call, low-cost, and thoughtful service” compared to the past “hard to hit, uncomfortable, and low price”. From the perspective of reform, the first way out of taxis is to win the reputation of users with the quality of service. This is the simple reason to play the role of the market, and it is also the simple reason for reforming the people.
Some people say that the Internet special car is a "squid" that stirs up the taxi industry, which has stimulated vitality and opened up new roads. It has also been said that the reform should not only enable a traditional industry to achieve transformational breakthroughs, but also face various disputes about special vehicles. In fact, more fundamental than these questions is how we understand the reform proposition of “making the market play a decisive role in resource allocation” and how we implement the “Internet Plus” national strategy. From this perspective, it can be understood why the reforms initiated by the reduction of “monetary money” have been widely praised. Why is “the Internet + 'convenient transportation” written in the “Guiding Opinions on Actively Promoting the “Internet +” Action?” Taxi management system and transportation management mode are regarded as the top priority of market-oriented reform.
Of course, the market is not omnipotent. Even if the taxi industry has achieved market-oriented reforms, it cannot ignore the post-reform supervision. From the international experience, taking the loose quantity control as an example, in 1984, 24 cities across the United States relaxed the quantity or rate control, resulting in problems such as excess taxis, reduced driver income, and degraded service quality. The original intention of the problem seems to have returned to the original point. Such examples have occurred in Singapore and Taiwan. Therefore, taxi reform “makes the market play a decisive role in resource allocation” and at the same time, it does not forget to “betterly play the role of the government” to be more comprehensive and reasonable. In other words, an industry that faces the market to release vitality should be encouraged and worth looking forward to; and how the government moves from regulation to supervision and management to service also has a long way to go.